Corrupt Judges Biased Against Fathers

Each state make BILLIONS to admin the Title 4D WELFARE PROGRAM. This is a conflict of interest, as it's in the judge's best interest to FORCE someone onto welfare, which is EXTORTION, and they will routinely ignore evidence of abuse.

"While technically the law shows no bias against fathers, the individual bias of judges, referees, attorneys, and litigants play a part in skewing most custody cases in favor of the mother."

"This is even worse for fathers of infants and toddlers. They are often prohibited from overnights with their children without court intervention and even when the court is involved the burden is on them to prove it’s safe for the child to stay overnight at their home."

"... Lawyers who tell their clients that moms automatically get custody and dad should only get a few days...This person bias against fathers is not only inaccurate but dangerous..."

"...fathers...go to represent themselves in court and the judge won’t let them even speak..." (Note, what is omitted, is when saying "a lawyer is important" is Corpus Juris Sanctum: "The lawyers PRIME DUTY is to 'the public' AND THE COURTS. When ever duties to the client come into conflict, THE PRIME DUTY PREVAILS! Lawyers ARE LICENSED BY THE STATE! The state gets BILLIONS from Title 4D. Multiple conflicts of interest that they do NOT disclose!)

I rather like this article, a bit more. There are also a lot of Fathers' Rights groups on Facebook, with hundreds of thousands of members, across them all, with dads from all over the world.